SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 número2Área de influencia aguas abajo de la presa La Cañada mediante series de tiempo de índices espectrales de vegetación (Periodo de estiaje 1990 - 2022)Modelos de estimación de emisiones de GEIs en embalses hidroeléctricos y aplicación a tres proyectos hidroeléctricos en Bolivia para obtener indicadores de sostenibilidad aplicables a la Evaluación de Impacto Ambiental índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Acta Nova

versión On-line ISSN 1683-0789

Resumen

MICHEL VARGAS, Ana María et al. Evaluation of the methods and processes for preparing Environmental Impact Assessment studies (EEIAs) of hydroelectric projects in Bolivia. RevActaNova. [online]. 2023, vol.11, n.2, pp.119-139.  Epub 30-Nov-2023. ISSN 1683-0789.  https://doi.org/10.35319/acta-nova.20234.

The EEIA in Bolivia is an instrument that does not measure the real negative, positive, direct, and indirect impacts. This fact is worrying knowing that the Plan of the Plurinational State of Bolivia to 2025 considers 44 hydroelectric projects. In this project, the methods, and processes for preparing the EEIAs of hydroelectric projects in Bolivia were evaluated, for which the competent authorities were requested the EEIAs and environmental documents of all hydroelectric projects, which were reviewed, analyzed, and interpreted holistically in workshops with experts. There were 5 hydroelectric projects that were analyzed with the help of comparative matrices and two of them were verified in the field. It was determined that 4 of the projects use the same method that, although they comply with environmental regulations, do not identify the real impacts, present superficial information, merge the operation and maintenance stages, 100% of the EEIAs do not mention biodiversity indices, they also do not quantify the real impact on them, their mitigation measures are almost null. Risk management is centralized like all impacts to the work and within it, they do not consider the possible threats and vulnerabilities of direct and indirect impacts, to the communities involved in the stages of the project, leaving a void for the prevention and mitigation of possible threats that could occur in the short, medium and/or long term. The EEIA needs clear and specific regulations, considering indicators and/or bioindicators that evaluate and quantify the real impacts at the ecosystem level.

Palabras clave : Methods; evaluation; socioeconomic and environmental impact; hydroelectric projects.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )