SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.7 número1Micropropagación de dos variedades de frutilla (Fragaria Ananassa Duch.) En diferentes medios de cultivoCaracterización de fincas productoras de limón (citrus aurantifolia) en Portoviejo, Ecuador índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de Investigación e Innovación Agropecuaria y de Recursos Naturales

versión impresa ISSN 2409-1618

Resumen

SARRIA BARDALES, José Antonio; CANTARO SEGURA, Jose Luis  y  MOSQUEIRA ROBLES, Alexandra. Comparative evaluation of feeders in the growth of cuyes (Cavia porcellus). RIIARn [online]. 2020, vol.7, n.1, pp.79-87. ISSN 2409-1618.

Abstract The objective of the research was to evaluate the productive and economic efficiency of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) during the growth stage, through the use of three types of feeders (clay well, plastic bird-type hopper and metal rabbit-type hopper) in interaction with two types of accommodation (cages and pools). 72 freshly weaned male improved guinea pigs (14 ± 3 days), belonging to the Cieneguilla-UNALM genotype, were used for seven weeks. A complete randomized design with factorial arrangement of six treatments and three replications of four animals in each was used; being: pool with clay well (T1), pool with plastic bird-type hopper (T2), pool with metal rabbit-type feeder (T3), cage with clay well (T4), cage with bird-type hopper (T5) and cage with metallic rabbit type feeder (T6). Balanced feed, which was wholemeal in flour, and water were supplied ad libitum. Weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion, losses, mortality and economic compensation were evaluated. The results indicate that the highest consumption (P<0.05), considering the decrease, as part of it, occurs in the treatments that used a clay well; meanwhile the plastic hopper feeder allowed the lowest percentage of lost food (P<0.05). Regarding the type of guinea pig, the cage system was superior (P <0.05) in weight gain. Finally, the T5 (plastic cage hopper) evidenced having the parameters below the numerical averages of the others, which had an impact on their remuneration and economic merit, being in this sense the most efficient alternative; considering only the food item as the productive cost

Palabras clave : guinea pig; equipment; facilities; feeders.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons